Friday, April 27, 2012

Dragons

On my new blog on Tumblr, I started writing about dragons and what I didn't care for about these books that had dragons in them.  Then I went on to talk about what dragons meant to me.  I was thinking of writing on here about dragons just to keep the blogs even. 

Dragons are majestic divine creatures.  They are better than lowly humans, for they fly and breathe fire and through that fire and flight they become a free creature.  Dragons dream, fight, speak, and through their strength and willpower, they can overcome any obstacle. 

I do prefer the European style dragon over the eastern style.  The main reason stems from Cornelia Funke's book Drago Rider.  I practically fell in love with the dragon(metaphorically) and idolized that character.  I found it so unique because any book that I have read and any movie that I have ever watched always featured the dragon as the enemy.  An unintelligent being that only kills the innocent.  For me, this wa a new experience, a change I never thougt possible.  And so there I became obsessed with dragons. 

Dragons are indeed very prideful creatures.  Pride and strength fall heavily on dragons.  They take pride in their fire, their flight, and have a huge competitive streak that drives them to survive.  We all know these canivorous and typical western characterizations.  But there is more to it than that.  Dragons are incredibly smart.  Though they do not think mathematically, they think geometrically.  They are true artists, painters, architects, writers, poets.  They encompass all the arts in their society.  And with it, they achieve the perfect society. 

Dragons do not rely on currency like humans rely.  In human society, everything has a complexity that makes things slow, complicated, and inneficient.  But wih dragons, there is no such complexity.  They live simple lives, without fear of disease, and famine.  They live in communities but sometimes adhere to a dragon king.  And with this they unite to defeat a common enemy, whatever it may be.  Not that they don't have wars themselves.  They do.  They fight for mates, territory, and submission.  So they to have violence, but on our level they are not like our money greeding political type of scandals and wars.

Dragons have emotion.  They understand emotion and naturally have love.  Dragons are some of the most passionate creatures.  Nothing is wrong or shameful if a male dragon hugs a male dragon.  For it is a sign of comradery, friendship, and a bond of unity.  And the male and female bonds have specia qualities of gracious love.  Sometimes the female is the dominant one of the mated couple, sometimes the male is the dominant of the mated couple.  But whichever is the case there is most of the time, true love. 

Dragon females one could say are very Spartan.  They are not whimps like many modern day women act like.  There is no limitations on females but rather, a sense of duty.  In times of war, if the male dragons are away and the enemy sneaks in, it is the duty of the female dragons to fight against the enemy and protect their hatchlings and their home.  They contribute as much as any female should.  And in this sense the dragon race has equality among the two genders.  Not that there are instances where this is not perfect.  Sometimes males take advantage of females, but it goes both ways.  If male dragons are dangerous, so are female dragons.  There is no true dominance. 

Those are some of the views I have on dragon society.  Perhaps I should truly write an essay on dragons and their behaviors.  I really should.  I will.  So perhaps I will even publish it, like a Plato's Republic almost.  That would be very fun.  Until then.  The message of the dragon sun god, Ra, has been spoken.  Until next time. 

,Starvix Draxon

Saturday, February 18, 2012

Temeraire Series

Good day everyone.  I hope you are all doing well, ja?  Gut.  Well, I have good news for everyone and I thought I would share with you guys, that I have found a new book series to read. 

Yea!  Right?  Well, I thought I would give a critique of the first two books, His Majesty's Dragon and Throne of Jade.  The books are written by Naomi Novik.  She was apparently a computer programmer for video games, but decided writing was her passion. 

So anyway.  The whole book series takes place during the Napoleanic Wars.  What makes this a fantasy books is that there is an airforce of dragons.  Dragons also fight in the wars.  Pretty awesome huh?  The story follows Captain William Laurence a man of 30 years is what I'm guessing, that captures a French ship and as a result finds a dragon egg.  The egg hatches and reveals a black dragon.  Later it is discovered that he is a Chinese Imperial, an extremely rare breed of dragons.  Laurence names the dragon Temeraire and procceed to the dragon training ground.  Later though it is discovered that Temeraire is actually a Chinese Celestial, even rarer than an Imperial.  In the second book they travel all the way to China because the Chinese want Temeraire back because only emperors of countries may own celestials. 

This is a good book series, I will admit.  Novik's gives grand description and detail in her books, something I need to grasp and work on.  However, the story naturally is in the eyes of Laurence rather than Temeraire.  That of course makes me unhappy but it never the less happens.  We do not get to see what Temeraire is doing or what he is thinking and often that leads to a weaker character.  Like in the second book, apparently he was courting a female and while that was happening, Laurance was having to fight off a Chinese gang of thugs that wanted to kill him.  We do not know this until after Laurence has finished fighting and has recovered.  (I also think later in the book, Temeraire and the female dragon, well, I think they well, love happened, which is something I would have loved to read.  ) But my point is clearly stated that I think in general her characterization is weak.  Not extremely weak, but weak in general. 

Another thing I will point out in the second book is that the back cover said they would discover something shocking and dark.  When I actually got to that point, I was still completely confused.  I still did not know if the prince was really trying to have Laurence killed or not and I still could not figure out what was so shocking and I was completely lost at why Temeraire was shipped to Napolean and...you guys haven't got a clue at what I am talking about do you?  Read the books and see if you guys can tell me what the shocking secret was.  Then you will be able to understand my confusion. 

So in some aspects, it's a really good book series, and in others it isn't that great.  Her diction is very extensive yet lacks good characterization and dialogue.  But it's still a good book.  I hope you guys decide to buy the book. 

Another note, Peter Jackson, director of Lord of the Rings, has decided to turn the series into a movie!  Wow!  If the characterization is weak in the books, I'm sure he'll fix it because I know he made the characters have more depth in Lord of the Rings compared to the books. 

So I hope you guys will go and buy this book series.  I reccommend it.  That's all for today.  Until next time. 

Starvix Draxon